The Constitution: A relevant document

The Constitution was written after many men died to free a nation of people suffering and lost due to the cruelties, and harsh lives caused them under the king. The Constitution was penned in the hopes that men would learn to live a good life guided by the laws laid down within its pages. The amendments added, for the most part, were added with the intention of making all men and women’s lives better. The Constitution is not a document to be pushed aside at the whims of political power, but a document to keep men free and able to pursue their dreams.

Lately, and especially today, we’re reminded that with the passing of time people have become complacent about the Constitution. We hear some politician or protestor complain that it’s an aging document and out-of-step with the times. Others complain that it was written by a bunch of old men that could not possibly know about the advances, and the way that modern technology would guide our lives. Many have said the same things about the Bible.

For those that believe in God, the Bible is a book of stories about the ways in which men and women learned to live a better life. It’s a book that contains the laws that we live by, and it’s a book that has come to our aid in times of trouble and sorrow. If a man cannot believe in a higher being, then let him at least take the laws and guidance of the Bible into his heart and home. If a man cannot see the beauty and the aim of our forefathers to make a life much more prosperous and better than the lives, they were fighting to preserve, then at least let him follow the message of the document and know the intention is for all things good.

It’s a strange thing that so many who have attended college and earned a degree, do not understand the purity of the Constitution. It’s not some idle document that has grown old with age, but a document that has freed a nation. Its purpose has always been to make our lives better, and still the point is missed by some of the most intelligent people in our nation. While psychologist and lawyers have worked under the guise of making the law equal for all, they have subverted the law to allow it to pamper the cruel and heartless in our society, while punishing those that have chosen a peaceful and lawful existence.

The man attacked on the street by three to four assailants dares not fight back, or he will be made to pay for the acts of his attackers. A nation attacked by terrorist are blamed for the acts of horror brought against them, and now, under the guise of equality, redistribution, and class-warfare, we’re all being taught that it’s our duty to support those who have put forth no effort for themselves. Marvelous the way it works, isn’t it? We take care of others because we owe them? We take care of others because we owe them? Repeat this several times and anger will well-up inside you against those that have taken the law and twisted it to suit their purpose.

The government has thrown out the Constitution, and why not? We have PhD’s working diligently to demean everything good and wholesome about our nation. We’ve become bullies in a world where others have asked us to fight their wars, supply their hungry with food, and get the heck out of the way as soon as they have what they want. We’re the bad guys because we have answered the call for almost every nation on earth. We have sacrificed our young mens lives for freedom, and they curse us.

We’re the bad guys and we deserve the fascist in the White House, the corrupt Senate, and the corrupt House. We deserve it because we have allowed them to take the law away from the people and use it to their own end. It was brought to my attention today that the generation below ours believes that it is inevitable that the Constitution and its laws will cease to matter. Why? Because things have been out-of-hand for many years now, and people are only waking up as we watch our country, our freedoms, and our rights disappear.

The NDAA was passed to ensure that the treacherous and treasonous government could continue without checks. That document has no place in a free society that already has the laws to deal with criminals, terrorist, and treasonous acts. The oath that each  of those 535 representatives and the president and vice president take is an allegiance to our Constitution. If they cannot serve the document, they cannot represent the people. If they are ineligible by the laws of that document to serve, they should not be allowed to enter  any branch of the government. It’s that simple.

Elitist v Voters

Those on the left still backing Obama are elitist who believe that he will create a Heaven on Earth for their benefit. They won’t have to work. No child will go hungry, and they will enjoy a leisurely life paid for by those who do work. Everyone will be equal. Yea, Stalin said all this and made many more promises and Russia—when the elitists were done—turned into a shite hole with all her resources depleted and bread lines cropping up across their nation.

Those who will vote for Mitt Romney are into the same fairy tale existence. Mitt will put the nation back on-course to prosperity. Mitt Romney most-closely resembles LBJ with his high-and-mighty  over-lord stance and his money for nothing values. Mitt must have learned every political trick he knows, relevant to this election cycle, from John McCain. Mitt’s all over the board with such things as:

·         I’m against abortion.

·         I’m for abortion.

·         Marriage is between a man and woman.

·         I believe in civil unions for all.

·         I won’t raise taxes.

·         I will raise taxes.

Yea, I think we already have that in the White House now. Mitt believes in the individual mandate and won’t repeal Obamacare. Mitt believes in “elitist stature” and will carry the power of POTUS just as Obama has and things won’t get better. He will be all about big government and leaving a hefty sum for the next two to three generations to pay. He has already proved through his governance of Massachusetts.

Newt was never my first choice, and I freely admit that but Romney is just Obama with an “R” after his name. Santorum doesn’t stand a chance, and Paul is certifiable. So we have a choice between another Obama, an alternate Obama, a guy who probably deserves more air time to let the people get to know him, and Gingrich. The one and only thing that makes me sure that I will vote for the candidate that has an “R” behind his name is that four more years of Obama, and we won’t have elections. He has subverted our laws and our Constitution to the point that our forefathers would no longer recognize the United States.

Nancy Pelosi and Ethics

Can one truly use Nancy Pelosi and ethics in the same sentence without fear of fire and brimstone? Dear Nan, whose income has doubled in the same three years that millions of Americans have lost their jobs, and their homes due to the rotten economy brought about by the Liberal-controlled Senate, House, and White House, wants to talk ethics? The same dear Nan whose drinking allowance runs “we the people” a hefty tax bill of $100-thousand monthly?  That’s the Nancy Pelosi that wants to talk about ethics?

According to Merriam Webster’s Dictionary, ethics are a system of moral values, or disciplines dealing with good and bad while carrying out duties or obligation. Dear Nan had to have her own private jet while acting as Speaker of the House. She, unlike many before her, could not commute using domestic airline services. That’s the same Nan, who took her grandchildren for joy-rides on the private jet. The same Nan who makes regular journeys to Italy—her parent’s roots of origins, and the same Nan, who is only a second-generation American by birth. That same Nan wants to talk about ethics while supporting the OWS and unions, and more importantly supporting Obama and his communist backed re-election campaign.

If ethics or a man’s sex life are the first considerations during elections, then we should have no-representation in Washington D.C., and no government could be elected by the people. We have given up on the “for the people” portion as none in D.C., in the media, or those creating poll numbers feel that “we the people” should have a voice. In fact, according to the newly anointed liberal Ann Coulter, we should sit quietly during a debate and listen. We’re not to have a voice in any of this. How dare we assume that because we pay our taxes, we should have a voice?

One quick look at our government tells us that Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood are busy marching across the Middle-East. Joe Biden…who knows where Biden’s head is or what he’s thinking? Okay, Biden and thought are scarcely words that could be used in the same sentence. Harry Reid is senile. It’s probably Dementia. Nancy Pelosi has to crawl out of her liquor bottle in the morning, and John Boehner is too busy ignoring violations of the Constitution to be bothered with his duties. In other words, we’re in a world of hurt, and they’re busy campaigning and running up flags they refer to “ethics,” “sex scandals,” and “corporate buyouts.”

The only thing that hasn't happened yet is violence in the streets and Obama’s puppet master Soros—the same guy monetarily backing the OWS along with the SEIU, the Muslim community, and the Communist—is promising that’s next!! Any questions?

Barakass Obama and the State of the Union Speech or How to Wage Class-Warfare

There are no-less than seven states of the United States demanding that candidates prove their eligibility to campaign for the office of President of the United States. One of those has demanded that Obama turn over the relevant documents, and he has refused. Georgia now states that there will be a bench warrant issued for his arrest. If you haven’t heard about this, it’s because the only news channel that felt it was pertinent to the 2012 elections was Fox News and at that, it was a short mention at the bottom of the hour.

It is a court of law, and Obama does not feel that the law can be applied to him. This is nothing new as he went to the UN and not to Congress—the only branch of the U S government that can declare war—to wage war against Libya. Obama did not have the authority to declare war against Libya and as a result, Al Qaeda is in possession of weapons with disastrous capabilities. The Muslim Brotherhood is burning Coptic Christians and their places of worship in Egypt, and the Pope is being challenged to order Catholic University to conform to healthcare mandates that state insurance policies must cover abortion. Obama is not bound by the law, but the Catholic Church is supposed to be compelled to go against the laws of God to suit this administration’s whims.

There are also several states that have decided to aid in wiping drug abuse by requiring welfare recipients to take drug tests. Rightly, they feel that by giving addicts the funds, they require to purchase drugs, they are aiding and abetting in the drug abuse. One Democrat in Virginia, more concerned with re-election numbers than the human loss, is crying “foul.”The Democrats always cry foul when one of their voting useful is cut off the government teat to fend for himself and his drug habit. On the other hand, the Democrats are never terribly concerned when POTUS shuts down the possibility of 40 thousand jobs because he is concerned that a pipeline  will disrupt the gentle course of nature. Never mind, that pipelines have been in use for decades, and we know what the risks are…nil!

Obama was busy with class-warfare, blame Bush, and forget about how severely five years of Democratic-controlled government has screwed up this nation. “NO,” Barakass Obama, we do not want to continue to return to failed democratic policy, and that’s why come “Hell or High Water” and barring the socialist revolution your pal Soros is planning, you will be out of office on your butt come January 20, 2013.

Thank you to APNews for the excellent photo of Obama with his mouth open, again.

It’s Not Romney or Nothing

Liberals are very much aware that they have missed their mark. How on earth could Newt Gingrich win the SC primaries? They lied and got rid of Herman Cain. They managed to get rid of Perry and Bachmann, and they’ve done everything imaginable to screw up the debates. The liberals want Romney to be the candidate. The GOP—old guard—want Romney to be the nominee, so what’s gone wrong?

The people! To be more precise, “We the people” are tired of having the polls loaded, the liberals dictating the outcome of GOP primaries through broadcasting, vote casting, and lies, and have spoken. It might be difficult in the conformist halls of Congress and media outlets to believe that people are sick of them, but we’re sick of them.

Just yesterday, in a comment, another liberal was trying to blame Bush for Obama’s screwed up administrative decisions, and it doesn’t work anymore. Must they constantly be reminded that two days into the Bush administration the stock market failed and the liberals blamed Bush? They’ve blamed him for the catastrophic misguided congressional maneuverings that allowed Barney Fwankinweinie and Christ Double-Dipper to get away with wrecking the housing market. Somehow, the liberals tend to forget it was Nan Pelosi that was responsible  for the House and aided in the Senate by Harry Reid during the last two years of Bush’s administration when all the economy started going south. It’s been Obama since 2009, and the liberals are still trying to blame Bush. Grow up liberals. You made your bed and now must lie in it.

Yesterday’s premature announcement of the winner of the presidential elections was probably meant to reflect badly on the GOP, and it doesn’t. It’s just one more trick played on the people by the MSM and the liberals. If they wanted to reflect poorly on the GOP and conservatives, they would have chosen one of the other Republican candidates such as Ron Paul whose chances are the same as a snowball in Hades.

Here’s a suggestion. Turn off the MSM and Fox and read at least three different versions of the same political story and somewhere in the middle, you’ll get to the truth. Obama is going to try to run against the Senate and House, to avoid running on his record of fail and fail some more. Those up for election in the House and Senate will try to run against Obama; however, since they have done NOTHING to stop his assault on our Constitution, find a conservative candidate that opposes the incumbent and vote for him or her. It’s truly time to change the face of politics, and I don’t mean “Hope and Change!” Simply put, it’s time to put the old dogs out to pasture with Obama!

 Thank you Fun and Run Facebook community for one of the best photos of all time.

Dumbed-Down Americans and the National Inquirer Media

If the average American put half as much effort into finding out what the candidates are about instead of watching reality shows, we would have a better shot at national recovery. A generation of younger Americans who will vote for a candidate because “Dope is Cool” and older adults who don’t know the issues because the debates and political news interfere with their reality show will not patch the rifts that have developed in this country. Who cares what lipstick or dresses the stars wore on the red carpet? Who cares who wins Survivor, American Idol, or Dancing with the Stars? None of those things will help to create jobs, reduce inflationary prices, or put America on a course to heal and recover. It’s all about dumbing down America and ensuring that voters don’t really know what the candidates will or will not do.

If you want to know these men and their political records, you’re going to have to dig deep and read it for yourself. The main-stream  media outlets are busy digging into their personal lives and asking bedroom questions. The main reason is to avoid the reality that Obama’s record in the oval office is pathetic surpassing the ineptitude shone by Carter, and rivaling the paranoid schizophrenia that Nixon’s administration portrayed. The New York Times has been doing tail-spins to cover up a recently released book about the Obama’s that is basically a tell-all proving that Michelle’s hatred for this country rules Barak’s politics and policies, so ABC goes overboard interviewing a candidate’s ex-wife.

ABC and the other major media outlets spread lies and inaccuracies in 2008 so that Barak’s “Down-low” life in Chicago would not be a portion of the election news. Now in 2012, ABC goes to Newt’s ex-wife of 10-years to get what they assumed would be inflammatory news that could destroy his campaign. So, the theory is a candidate living a secretive life whose activities place any government security he might breach in a precarious position is not nearly as important as the tales an ex-spouse might sell to the media. Have you seen the ex and can you imagine that her reason for telling tales out of court might be more because the position of the first lady is not in her future rather than, she feels the public needs to know? We already knew Newt was a Tom Cat and not too terribly different from Bill Clinton. However, as the liberals said—all those years ago—“His roving eye and scoundrel ways will do nothing to affect his ability to perform his job.”

Sex, lies, and drugs may sell more copy, but it certainly does little to improve the state of this nation. There was a discussion about how to handle the Democratic Spin-Machine yesterday, and some of us feel “Fire with Fire” is the best answer at this point. In case anyone living under a rock in the middle of the Saudi dessert doesn’t know, the media is all in the soup bowl with the Obama administration and their march to poverty for the American people. They should have done the math before jumping on the commie-train, because fewer people working, fewer people able to pay bills, means fewer people watching the crap they produce and claim to be entertainment. When you get tired of making ends “almost” meet from week-to-week, then perhaps you will wake up and let the media know you’re sick of hearing what a wonderful job Obama is doing, while your paycheck shrinks.

In the mean-time, Obama believes he is the 4^th most successful president of all-time. He gives himself high-ratings, and no media outlet calls him on it. Shameful, isn’t it?

Homeland Security and the List of Terrorist Suspects

If you’ve wondered why it is that citizens and not the government have had to stop the most heinous terrorist attempts since Obama took office, you should wonder no more. The Department of Homeland Defense has been looking for a needle in the haystack while the barn was burning to the ground. 

The list of possible terrorist suspects reads as follows:

·         White

·         Right-wing political nut-job

·         Gun owner with fire power

·         Christian with a firm belief in God as the creator

·         Ex-military

·         Doesn’t trust government.

·         Dislikes illegal immigration

Let’s take Nadal Hassan. You remember him? He was the shooter in the Ft. Hood incident. We’re not calling it a terrorist situation, because he was a disgruntled employee with a history of professed hatred toward the United States and had made several email contacts with Al-Alwaki. For Hassan, perhaps the list should have said tawny-white and presently employed by the United States government, as a soldier in the armed forces.

The media did its best to blame the Tea Party for Jared Loughner, but failed miserably when it turned out that he was a left-wing nut-job with fire power. Jared, as it turns out didn’t like anyone, and he certainly had some ambivalence toward God as the creator. However, we have to forgive the liberal media during their fire-storm reportage of having the wrong allegiances for Jared.

How did they come up with Ex-Military? Well, it seems that regardless of the Clinton administration receiving no-less than 500 communiqués informing them of a possible bombing in Oklahoma City, no steps were taken to prevent the attack. Now, several years later, evidence has turned up that leads back to Al Qaeda and the Muslim terrorist of the Middle-East.

And what about “Doesn’t trust the government?” They cited 1990 fears that illegals would take American jobs and that the government would sell industry down the pike with industry moving their production to Mexico. Why that’s just silly, isn’t it? Another feather in Bill Clinton’s hat due to NAFTA and agreements signed, it wasn’t just Mexico that took away American jobs. Canada, China, and several other countries now produced sub-standard products that Americans pay through the nose to purchase.

They should have started the list with:

·         Politician

·         White or Black, possibly Hispanic

·         Willing to screw their own mothers to the wall

·         Corrupt

·         Self-Serving Elitist

·         Unhappy with the status quo

·         Possibly deaf, dumb, blind, and illiterate

There’s your true list of terrorist, and they’re occupying Capitol Hill as this is being penned.